The UFO Files The Unsealed Archive
PURSUE - DOSSIER

PURSUE-01/usper-statement  /  2025-late  /  FBI

USPER Statement — Super-Hot Orb, Helicopter Pursuit, US Military Facility (Late 2025)

FBI 302 interview with a senior US intelligence official ("USPER") describing a first-hand UAP encounter at a US military facility in late 2025. The most consequential single-witness item in PURSUE Release 01 by witness rank, behavior described, and durational complexity. Almost no breakout coverage.

CLASSIFICATION DECLASSIFIED  /  CONFIDENCE HIGH  /  PURSUE Release 01

Aerial view of the Pentagon, Department of War headquarters, May 15, 2023.
The Pentagon / DOD photograph / 15 May 2023

Summary

FBI 302 interview with a senior US intelligence official (“USPER”) describing a first-hand UAP encounter at a US military facility in late 2025. The most consequential single-witness item in PURSUE Release 01 by witness rank, behavior described, and durational complexity. Almost no breakout coverage.

Verbatim AARO Description

“This is an FBI 302 interview conducted with a senior US intelligence official regarding his first-hand account of a UAP encounter at a US military facility. USPER relayed to FBI agents that he and other federal and state personnel conducted searches to where orbs had been previously seen. After searching the area with a helicopter, they found a ‘super-hot’ orb hovering over the ground. The orb is reported to have travelled for 20 miles at a speed too fast for the helicopter in pursuit. An additional ‘swarm’ of lights were seen moving in all directions. A total of four or five additional orbs were seen shortly thereafter for a short time, flaring up and then down. This pattern of four or five orbs flaring up, then down continued over the next thirty minutes across the area.”

Why This Item Is Heavy

  1. Witness rank. “Senior US intelligence official.” Not a pilot, not a contractor, not a third-party witness. Someone who, by definition, has classified-information clearance and has been judged credible by the intelligence community for years.
  2. Multi-jurisdictional. “He and other federal and state personnel” — multiple agencies on the ground.
  3. Active pursuit, not passive sighting. Helicopter deployed. Pursuit failed because the orb outran the helicopter for 20 miles. That establishes a lower bound on the orb’s velocity well above a helicopter’s max speed (typically 150–200 mph).
  4. Temperature. “Super-hot” implies passive thermal observation, possibly via FLIR / IR sensor on the helicopter.
  5. Sustained behavior. 30 minutes of orbs “flaring up, then down” in patterns. Not a flash, not a single object, not a brief encounter. A 30-minute multi-orb event.
  6. Location. Filed location: “United States.” Likely the same western US testing-grounds context as the September 2023 Bronze Ellipsoid case and the “orbs launching orbs” 2023 event.

What This Looks Like If True

A US military facility was the site of a sustained multi-orb event in late 2025. A senior US intelligence official, on the record, swears to it. Helicopters could not catch the orbs. The orbs were thermally active. The pattern lasted half an hour.

If the AARO description is accurate, this is functionally a UAP equivalent of the Tehran 1976 Yarbi case — high-rank witnesses, military pursuit, equipment tracking, sustained encounter — but updated, civilian-jurisdiction-blended, and on the public record.

Caveats

  • The 302 narrative is third-hand: AARO summarizing FBI summarizing the witness.
  • “USPER” is FBI shorthand for “U.S. Person” — standard redaction practice but means we don’t know which intelligence agency or what the witness’s specific position is.
  • “Super-hot orb” is qualitative. Without thermal sensor data attached we cannot calibrate the claim.
  • “Speed too fast for the helicopter in pursuit” is bounded but not measured.

What Would Move This From Heavy To Decisive

  • Helicopter onboard sensor data (FLIR thermal track, radar).
  • The witness’s identity declassified or named under oath.
  • Corroborating witness statements from the “other federal and state personnel” present.
  • The specific facility named.

None of those are in this release.

Connections

Open Questions

  • Why has this case received less coverage than the football-shaped object?
  • Is the witness the same intelligence official tied publicly to any prior UAP testimony cycle (Grusch / Mellon / Kirkpatrick generation)?
  • Is this the same incident that triggered the FBI Photo B-series of late-2025 western US sensor stills?